|
Laws in Other States
Use the [BACK] button on your browser to return to
this
page
Case Law
New York and
Missouri have been the two states long known to require "clear and
convincing evidence" of a patient's wish to forgo a specific life
sustaining treatment. Missouri's stringent requirement for such evidence
was upheld by the US Supreme Court in Cruzan v.
Director Missouri Dept. of Health in 1990. Michigan now appears to
also require this standard of evidence following the 1995 Michigan Supreme
Court ruling in Re:
Martin.
Other states permit surrogate decision making because of the case law
in those states, or with specific statutes. Below are some examples of
such statutes. There are also some states in which recent court
rulings have affected this process.
A case of related interest in California is Conservatorship
of Wendland, discussed here by attorney Lawrence Nelson.
Also, see
ACLU article, and for an opposing view: Robert's
Legacy. Other Wendland articles are at: Wendland
links page.
A Wisconsin case, Spahn v. Eisenberg, 543
N.W.2d 485 (Wis. 1997)--also
in PDF-- and a
Kentucky case,
DeGrella
v. Elston, 858 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. 1993). raise similar issues.
Statutes
For more information, E-mail Family Decision Coalition
For questions about website, E-mail Jack Freer
|